• Welcome
• Introduction
• A huge political affair
• The research
  and the persons behind it
• The main characters
• The Algeria connection
• Jean-Michel in the army
• The 1977 interview with “Véronique”
• Brigitte the teacher
• The pictures
• The facial recognition
• Brigitte Macron as a woman
• The pedophiles around the Macrons
• Other noteworthy facts
• The court cases
• Update tracker

SEVENTH CASE: APRIL, 2025, PARIS

NATACHA REY
vs
JEAN-LOUIS AUZIÈRE, CATHERINE AUZIÈRE-AUDOY, HENRI MONS (their lawyer) &
ACCOMPLICES (possibly Brigitte Macron)

Forgery and use of forgeries
Fraud in the face of justice
as an organised group

• Just like the request to the European Court of Human Rights, this case is a direct reaction to the proceedings of the Second Case.
• In that case, as in the Third, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy are convicted for words that were not taken from the literal transcript of the video, but based on seven passages compiled by the accusers, which are not literal phrases from the video.
• The summary and the seven passages should have been considered forgeries, as they are not the words Natacha and Amandine have said. It is not possible to condemn someone for defamation based upon formulations and rewordings of the actual, literally spoken or published words.
• In a video interview of September 1, 2025, Natacha confirmed that Jean-Louis Auzière and his wife will been indicted.