BRIGITTEGATE
COURT CASES
THE TWELFTH CASE
Natacha and her lawyer François Danglehant expose how the elite are above the law
TWELFTH CASE: JULY 27, 2025, PARIS
NATACHA REY
vs
BRIGITTE MACRON, JEAN-MICHEL TROGNEUX,
JEAN ENNOCHI (their lawyer),
DELPHINE CHAUCHIS (main judge of the Third Case),
MARIE-SUZANNE LE QUÉAU (attorney general of the Paris Appeals Court),
ISABELLE RAYNAUD-GENTIL (advocate-general of the Paris Appeals Court),
EMMANUEL MACRON,
other lawyers and judges of the Second and Third Cases &
X
Forgery, fraud, and fraud in the face of justice as an organised group
- This case is then a direct reaction to the dealings of the Third Case, the case in which Brigitte Macron accused Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy of defamation.
- It is a case based on illegal procedural actions of the court and the judges during this third court case, which were the basis of the conviction in first instance.
- In that case, the 17th Chamber of the Paris Tribunal accepted that the whole of the transcript of the 4-hour video of Natacha and Amandine would be accepted as evidence of the claimed defamation, while the full transcript had never been included in the complaint: only a summary had been submitted to the court.
- By the time Brigitte Macron’s lawyer wanted the full transcript to be added to the case, the statute of limitations (which is only 3 months for defamation) had long expired, making it legally not acceptable.
- The case should have been filed with the transcript and based on the literal quotes of Natacha and Amandine.
- To make matters worse, the main accusation for which Natacha and Amandine were originally convicted is that they would have claimed that Brigitte Macron and Jean-Michel Trogneux had forged birth, marriage and death certificates.
- This claim was never pronounced by either Natacha or Amandine, they said in general that these had to be forgeries.
- It would also be absurd for Natacha to have claimed that both Brigitte Macron AND Jean-Michel Trogneux had forged documents, as she considers these names one and the same person: Brigitte Macron.
- Jean Ennochi, Brigitte’s lawyer, made the claim that even if Natacha had not literally said that it had been Brigitte and Jean-Michel who were the forgers, it can be “deducted” from the context.
- Obviously, if we go deducting the hidden meaning of words and have these deductions accepted in court as proof of wrongdoing, there are few people who cannot be accused of crimes.
- Because the Paris Tribunal accepted all this judicial mumbo-jumbo, Natacha is now suing the main judge, together with Brigitte Macron and the supposedly existing Jean-Michel Trogneux.
- In a never before seen move, the attorney-general and advocate general of the Paris Appeals Court have submitted a request to the Cassation Court to annul the verdict of their own court, which acknowledged that loads was wrong in this case, and acquitted Natacha and Amandine.
- Because they plead that the verdict of the Paris Tribunal had been good and lawful, while in reality, it is riddled with illegalities, Natacha has added them to this case: all of these people agree that what happened in that Tribunal is totally legal and good and OK, while in reality, it was absurd, leading Natacha’s lawyer François Danglehant to make the comparison with how the French courts’ functioned under the “Vichy regime”, the government that collaborated with the Nazi occupation of France during WWII.
- In an interview on Radio Courtoisie of October 23, 2025, François Danglehant confirms that in total some 16 persons are accused in this case, a lot more than we had heard so far, with the non-named “X” added for unknown persons at the Elysée who would have helped the Macrons in pulling off this judicial fraud.
- The scheduling hearing is planned for May 26, 2026.