BRIGITTEGATE

OTHER NOTEWORTHY FACTS

There is so much more to this

The real Brigitte Trogneux

The biggest question obviously is: what has happened to the real Brigitte Trogneux? Where is she? Is she still alive?
Xavier Poussard suggests the possibility that she might have had a terminal illness and before passing, let her transsexual brother take over her identity.
Pressibus believes she died in 1961, and that there is a Brigitte born into the Auzière family (thus with the maiden name Brigitte Auzière) who is the mother of the Auzière children.
Natacha Rey also believes that the children must have gotten their Auzière name from their mother, and that André Auzière is an invention to justify the fact that the children have this last name: she and Pressibus believe that Jean-Michel Trogneux/Brigitte Macron is the real father, but that he/she was never declared as such, and that the children were given the last name of their mother.
As we have no clue whatsoever, every speculation is a possibility.
It is clear that the reveal of what happened to Brigitte Trogneux will be the most conclusive proof, and it is the central question that has to be answered at present.

The funerals of Annie Trogneux and her daughter

On July 15, 2025, Anne-Marie (Annie) Trogneux was buried. The eldest of the Trogneux siblings had died on July 3rd, at 93 years old, which did not prevent the French MSM, the loyal serfs of the Elysée, to make a big drama of this “terrible loss”. The way they tried to portray Brigitte Macron as this deeply saddened victim of a horrible event is simply farcical and over the top.
But way more importantly is that not a single picture of the funeral has come out. The church and its surroundings were off-limits, nobody was allowed to take pictures or even come close. However, the church is located on a little square with lots of houses from which people could have taken pictures and videos of the attendees. Strangely enough, no footage or picture has been leaked so far, even though it would be enormously interesting to see who attended this funeral. The French must be clearly scared of what will happen to them if they would leak footage of what happened in their public street and around their church.
The ever loyal MSM were not questioning anything, and only confirmed that Jean-Michel and Monique are now, together with Brigitte, the only surviving Trogneux siblings. The fact that Brigitte Macron is claimed to be Jean-Michel, who is never anywhere to be seen, was simply swept under the rug, as if nobody is discussing this.
If Brigitte Macron was serious about suffering from the “rumours” and wanted it all to stop, this funeral would have been the perfect occasion to have the photographers (who were present and took pictures of the Macrons) take a picture of her with Jean-Michel and Monique, and thus prove that she is actually not her brother. But of course that never happened.
What did happen is that Brigitte Macron spent a few days extra in Amiens. One can only speculate how much time she spent terrorising everybody in-the-know to keep their mouths shut at all costs. With the affair getting international attention, the pressure must be high for people with a little bit of honesty and conscience left.
Remarkably, Annie’s oldest daughter, Christine Haquin-Boulogne, died only a good two weeks after her mother, on July 19, 2025. Only four years younger than her aunt Brigitte Trogneux, she was another figure of the high bourgeoisie, as she had married into a famous colonial family, but never mentioned by Brigitte Macron in her official legend creation. On August 14, 2025, Candace Owens has shown two very short clips of overhead footage of Christine’s funeral procession going towards the cemetery. Unsurprisingly, le Petit Gros (the person alleged by the Elysée to be Jean-Michel Trogneux) is so far nowhere to be seen.

The signatures

There is quite something to say about the signatures of Brigitte Macron, Brigitte Auzière-Trogneux and Jean-Michel Trogneux. There is even one document from 2007 that has both the signatures of Brigitte and Jean-Michel Trogneux, while Brigitte was not only not present officially, but had also nothing to do with it at all, let alone have to sign anything: it makes no sense whatsoever that we find her signature on that document. The fact that this error occurs only on the original, but not on the duplicate that was created at the same time, strongly gives the impression that she signed automatically with “Brigitte Trogneux”, and then was reminded she of course was supposed to be Jean-Michel Trogneux in this document. The mistake had to be pointed out to her, and was then not repeated on the second copy.
For now, there is not yet a separate page with all the information regarding the signatures, but it is one of the leads that Brigittologists are following: the few pieces of handwriting we have seem to indicate that Brigitte Macron’s handwriting is not that of the original Brigitte Auzière-Trogneux.

The teeth issue

It is claimed that the school pictures of Jean-Michel Trogneux prove that he had a gap between his two upper central incisors, which is seen again in a later picture of Brigitte Macron as a teacher. There is even a mention in a gossip magazine that shows the difference with the present set of teeth, claiming Brigitte Macron had her teeth straightened a later age.
However, the family picture shows a smiling Jean-Michel Trogneux with perfect teeth. Hence the conclusion that this picture has been worked on, in order to remove the dental gap that would give away that Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux.
Fact is that we have only three pictures of Jean-Michel Trogneux in which we can see some of his teeth: two school pictures and the family picture. In the younger picture (where he’s 7-8 years old), there indeed seems to be a huge gap between the two incisors. The older picture (9-10 years old) shows Jean-Michel with a very tiny opening between his lips, which makes us guess something similar, but with a much smaller gap. And then in the family picture the teeth seem just perfect.
We have the same issue with the pictures of Brigitte as a teacher: there is clearly something wrong with the two incisors, but is there really a gap? Is what we see the result of orthodontic attempts to remove the gap?
What remains clear is that the perfect teeth on the family photo are highly suspect.

Brigitte and the school uniform

Brigitte Macron claims to have worn a school uniform for 15 years, from kindergarten until high school graduation. Jean-Michel Trogneux might have done so. But by the time Brigitte Trogneux, who is 8 years younger, went to high school, the uniform had been abandoned.

Brigitte and the motorbike

Another clash of memories can be found in comparing two different interviews: one from Maëlle Brun’s book Brigitte Macron L’affranchie, in which she mentions that Brigitte Trogneux received a Piaggio Ciao moped for obtaining her school certificate in 1969, at age 16.
But in a TV interview, when asked if she ever ‘mounted’ a Harley Davidson, Brigitte Macron said “Yes, but I wasn’t allowed to tell daddy. Our parents considered two-wheelers too dangerous. So we rode them, but kept it from them.”
It is extremely likely that Jean-Michel Trogneux, 8 years older than Brigitte Trogneux, and with a much older brother and brothers-in-law, would have been given the opportunity in the late 1950s to drive their motorbikes, as long as it was kept secret. But for Brigitte Trogneux, growing up in a different time and having received a moped at 16, such a memory is completely out of place.

Brigitte in the US

Brigitte Macron also claims to have been living, alone, in the US at the time of the first alleged Apollo moonlanding, in 1969. Brigitte Trogneux was then just 16 years old. Jean-Michel Trogneux was then 24 years old. Having Brigitte Trogneux, at 16, living alone in the US is not credible and doesn’t fit into the whole official narrative. This memory makes sense only for Jean-Michel Trogneux, and it looks like Brigitte Macron has remembered her own life here, instead of her sister’s.

Brigitte in the UK

However, in the weekly newspaper Lynn News of August 23, 1974, Brigitte Trogneux‘s name appears as one of the persons who took part in a 2-month English course in the small town of Lynn, Norfolk, England.
Did she need to learn English after having lived in the US 5 years earlier? Or was this a different Brigitte from the one who had gone to the US?

Brigitte as a marriage witness

According to Anne-Marie Bouchez, Brigitte Trogneux was a witness to her marriage in 1976. The fact is recounted on the The Pictures page, where the picture she proved her memory with is shown, and the weirdness surrounding this testimony is discussed.
Brigitte Trogneux was also a witness at her brother Jean-Michel’s wedding in 1980. The legal wedding registration is not public yet, as these documents are kept private for 75 years. But it was somehow published by the journalists Jonathan Moadab and Paul-Eric Blanrue in their ‘debunking dossier’, published in January 2022. Remarkably, this document lists Brigitte as “Brigitte Auzière”, with no other last name. It is, however, mandatory for these legal documents to record married women by their maiden name! The name of an eventual spouse is legally not even supposed to be added.
This has led Pressibus to conclude that the mother of the Auzière children is a woman born as Brigitte Auzière.

A late marriage

All the Trogneux children married very young, except for Jean-Michel. The four girls got married at 23 or younger, and Jean-Claude marries at 26. As already mentioned, all three older girls and Jean-Claude marry into wealthy business families, Rotary Club friends of their father’s. Brigitte marries into what seems to be a related family of secret agents and colonials.
Jean-Michel marries at 35, with someone who, as far as we know, is not related to the Trogneux family at all (Véronique Dreux), and divorces her 7 years later.
Even here, he’s clearly the odd one out.

And a very late divorce

It is remarkable and noteworthy that the divorce from André Auzière was officialised in 2006 only, just before Brigitte marries Emmanuel Macron in 2007.
Brigitte (then still using the name Auzière) had started an affair with Emmanuel Macron in late 1992, and André Auzière is said to have angrily left the Auzière residence in Amiens already in 1993. (Remember there is hardly any proof of his existence anyway, it is not as if, before 1993, we find his presence everywhere.)
One can only speculate what a man goes through when he discovers his wife has a relationship with a 14-year old (if he really was married to the future Brigitte Macron, of course). But if you slam the door in rage upon learning your middle-aged wife is cheating on you with one of her under-aged students, would you not also immediately file for divorce and for the children’s custody (given that your wife has an illegal affair with a teenager), and make sure she’s out of your life as soon as possible? Instead of becoming this grey, paper background figure waiting to be dealt with whenever convenient and needed?

The fake jewellery shop lead

At the beginning of his research, Xavier Poussard erroneously copied an entry from google books as “Jean-Michel, Henri Trogneux acquired the Gallice jewellery store located at 25, rue des Boucheries in Toulon (Var), address that served as his domicile”.
He published this information in the first issue of Faits & Documents that dealt with Brigitte Macron, but discovered a few months later that he had clubbed two entries of google books together, due to the way the search results were displayed. In reality, the entry refers to Jean-Michel Trogneux as the manager of a newly registered company, Picardie Métal, in Blangy-Tronville, and the details concerning the jewellery store in Toulon pertain to a totally different and unrelated person.
Toulon is in the Provence, in the south-east of France, 800 kilometres from Amiens, while Blangy-Tronville is a village just next to Amiens, not even 10 kilometres away. Clearly a huge difference.
However, instead of using this absurdity in their processes against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, or to publicly debunk the research into Brigitte Macron’s past, this false information was confirmed to Xavier by the person who had shared a flat with Jean-Jacques Trogneux, when he called back to tell Xavier that Jean-Jacques’s father had nothing mysterious and was “un petit gros”. This obviously is absurd: the fact that the people who are spoken to are repeating wrong information from within the Brigittologist scene, proves that they are not interested in setting straight a “fake news”, but are desperately trying to put the Brigittologists off-track and to sabotage their search for the truth.
It is also noteworthy that Picardie Métal, the company that was registered in 1973 with Jean-Michel Trogneux as its manager, was a sham company, probably set up to siphon off money in a deal about tennis courts renovations between father Jean Trogneux and a business friend. After a few years, the liquidation of the company started and it was officially closed by court order in 1982.

Some like it really hot

In a short TV street interview with Brigitte Macron about the start of Emmanuel’s first presidency, she answered to criticism against Macron with “Personne n’est parfait. Nobody is perfect. It’s one of my best films, Some Like It Hot, I recommend you watch it.”
The fact that she claims that this movie is somehow “hers” was not addressed by the interviewer.
“Nobody’s perfect” are effectively the words with which Billy Wilder’s famous comedy from 1959 ends. The movie deals with homosexuality and transvestites, mostly for comedic effect. The words finish the final movie dialogue, between a man and his love interest, as the man is set on marrying the fake woman. The (heterosexual) transvestite tries to wiggle out of it without revealing he’s been fooling the man all this time, but nothing works. When he reveals he’s not a woman but a man, the closing reply is “Well, nobody’s perfect!”
Brigitte Trogneux was 7 years old in 1959, Jean-Michel Trogneux 15.

The female father

On February 26, 2020, a reception took place at the Elysée palace, where different interest persons and groups were invited to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. Invited was also Pascale Morinière, then president of the Associations des Familles Catholiques (AFC: Associations of Catholic Families). She confronted Emmanuel Macron with the shocking fact that just a few days earlier, the law on “PMA” (procreation médicalement assistée, artificial insemination) had been altered to exclude the need for a man as a parent to the child that would result from the procedure. Formerly, only heterosexual couples had been legally allowed to have PMA treatment, now all women were accepted, single or with a female partner. This now leaves some kids without at least a legally registered father. In discussing this with Emmanuel Macron, he left her aghast by proclaiming that fathers can be symbolic, and, noticing her shock, added “Your problem is that you believe that a father is necessarily a male.”

The phallus of Notre Dame

At the beginning of 2023, Roselyne Bachelot publishes a book, 682 jours, in which she tells stories from the 682 days she worked as a minister in Emmanuel Macron’s cabinet. She makes a little remark that doesn’t go unnoticed and has social media buzzing for days: after the fire of the Notre Dame, which resulted in the collapse of the roof and fully destroyed the spire, several proposals for the project of reconstructing the roof and spire were being looked at. Roselyne, in a very passing way, mentions that the Elysée wanted it to be an architectural statement, and that Brigitte Macron proposed to rebuild the Notre Dame spire as “some sort of an erected phallus with golden balls around its base”.
Obviously, the loyal press (the only reason Macron was ever elected) fell all over themselves in their haste to ‘debunk’ this ‘bad joke’ or ‘misrepresented and exaggerated claim’.
But Roselyne never apologised or changed her claim.

Public privacy

When confronted with the absence of proof and testimonies of her early years, Brigitte Macron constantly claims that nobody has the right to question anything about the private life of the Macrons, and that therefore, there is the omertà in place, and no friends or relatives are allowed to give interviews.
However, nobody ever asked her to be a public figure. It was the Macrons themselves who during the presidential campaign put Brigitte in the spotlights and made the whole election about her instead of about the achievements of Emmanuel Macron as a politician – which of course were non-existent. It was their own decision to have photoshoots at the beach and everywhere they went, publishing all these glorifying articles about Brigitte Macron’s past as a fabulous, gorgeous teacher.
Brigitte is actually known to be an attention addict, feasting on having reporters and film crews follow her wherever she goes – but only to fawn over her, not to ask difficult questions about her problematic past.
If Brigitte Macron was really Brigitte Trogneux, she would logically be very happy to get all eyes on her when she endlessly talks about her youth.
But she does the opposite. Well, her total silence and refusal are very understandable if Brigitte Macron grew up as Jean-Michel Trogneux.

Alexandra’s testimony

In an interview posted on YT on February 17, 2025, Alexandra Brazzainville made a remarkable comment.
Alexandra was born intersex (with physical genital elements of both sexes), and needed help to ‘transition’ to one gender, in this case female. She was helped in her youth by Françoise Noguès, the mother of Emmanuel Macron.
Alexandra is also an acquaintance of Laurence Auzière, who had asked her one day if she could make some public statement in support of Brigitte Macron, which she did. Obviously, she got some serious backlash for doing so, and she later went on to give interviews and participate in panel discussions on the YT channel Géopolitique Profonde (GPTV: an alternative, truther media channel mentioned in the cyber harassment court cases, naturally anti-Macron and dealing with Brigittegate from early on).
In the February interview (not with GPTV), Alexandra mentions in passing that she had asked Laurence Auzière if her mother had always been a mother. Laurence evaded a clear answer, but told her that “She has always been my maternal point of reference [ma référente maternelle, very hard to translate (“motherfigure”?) and a very convoluted way of indicating a person who has taken the role of mother]. She has always raised us as a mother [en qualité de mère, litereally ‘qualified as a mother’]. The rest is nobody’s business.”
This is only indirect proof and one testimony, but if true, it says everything. “Maternal point of reference” and “as a mother” means “not actually, biologically being our mother”.
And as Pressibus very correctly states: ‘the rest’ is precisely the business of the whole nation: identity theft, state lies, cheating of voters etc.

Dr. Patrick Bui

In another YT appearance, the same Alexandre Brazzainville recounted her interaction with the surgeon Patrick Bui.
Dr. Bui is well known for his specialisation: the feminisation of male-to-female transitioners, and especially the feminisation of the face, going as far as to change the shape of the cranial bones.
The fact that he had operated on Brigitte Macron was outed by none other than Mimi (Michèle) Marchand, until mid-2024 the owner of Bestimage (one of the main French celebrity photo agencies), and by now notorious for being embroiled in scandals with forgeries and drugs or sex trafficking.
The Macrons had hired Mimi’s services to sell the Macron couple to the larger public during their first presidential campaign (2016), spreading the pictures of this splendid couple everywhere. But when they wanted to distance themselves from her in 2018, when the scandals of this sulphurous person came to light, Mimi took her revenge by revealing that Brigitte Macron had undergone plastic surgery.
The nature of this surgery was hidden in an article that did not openly name the surgeon, but included a hint that made it very easy to identify him as the famous doctor Patrick Bui.
Alexandra knows Dr. Bui, and complimented him with his work on Brigitte Macron. When she remarked that she didn’t know he also feminised women, he allegedly answered: “But we don’t do feminisation of women! Because women are women. Come on, think a little.”
Other noteworthy facts here are that for her marriage with Emmanuel Macron, Brigitte Macron’s wedding dress was made by Barbara Bui, the sister of the surgeon, and that the good doctor himself received the “Légion d’honneur” (the highest order or merit in France) in 2023 from the hands of no other than Brigitte Macron herself.

Jean-Michel is declared dead

On May 30, 2025, Marlène Schiappa, former minister in Emmanuel Macron’s cabinet, declares on national television the “sordid” way in which Brigitte Macron is pushed to talk about her deceased brother in order to prove that she did not usurp his identity. It’s a completely insane attempt to defend Brigitte Macron, where everything is mixed up: who is now dead? And whose identity is supposed to be stolen?
It’s clear that this simpleton is either not able to get the official story clear, or that she is part of some scheme to confuse everybody even more.

Who’s transphobe now?

And lastly, if the Brigittologists are “transphobe” for discussing this topic, how can that be if Brigitte Macron were a CIS woman?
If you read carefully what the French MSM writes about this topic, it is actually they who are transphobe: they find it insane, outrageous and insulting to even suggest that Brigitte Macron would be trans. What does that say about their stance on transgenderism? If they were so inclusive, progressive and tolerant as they claim to be, would it not be great to have a president who was married to a trans woman? Would that not be something to be proud of? In the woke world, which they completely represent, that would be the thing to promote instead of vilify, no?
These accusations against the Brigittologists are clearly nothing but stupid diversions: there is no logic, no rationality in what the MSM claim, and they have certainly not a single argument to counter the research with.
The Appeal’s Court in it verdict that overturned the conviction of Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy confirmed exactly that: there is no defamation here, because there is nothing insulting in suggesting someone is transgender.
Brigitte Macron is now filing a cassation appeal against this verdict, which has resulted in the French LGBTQ scene angrily calling her out: if she is transgender, she should say so without shame, and if she isn’t, she should stop behaving as if it is the biggest insult one could ever get.
For the Brigittologists, the issue is not that it would be scandalous if Brigitte were transgender, but that she is criminally usurping her sister’s identity, and had a pedophilic relationship with her student. And that both have used the mainstream press to simply lie their heads off.
The issue is not about shaming trans people, but about being told the truth, instead of stupid lies.

Welcome
Back to top
Contact