EN Brigitte Macron As A Woman

BRIGITTEGATE

BRIGITTE MACRON
AS A WOMAN

Are we being taken for a psychological ride?

The term “gaslighting” means telling someone the opposite of what is obvious to all, giving that person the feeling that they are crazy if they trust their own observations instead of what they are being told. It is in fact saying “don’t believe your own eyes, believe me instead”.

The word is derived from the 1944 Hollywood movie Gaslight (starring Ingmar Bergman), which was based on the 1938 theatre play Gas Light by Patrick Hamilton.
It is a thriller set in Victorian London, when people lighted their apartments and houses with gas coming through pipes branched off of the pipes that ran under the streets to fuel the lamp posts.

[Spoiler alert: if you are planning to watch the movie and don’t want to know the plot including the final reveal, skip ahead to the next paragraph!]
The plot of the play is a detective/thriller story about a couple in which the husband is convincing his wife that she is mad.
The wife is suspicious because she notices real and unsettling things: her husband leaves every evening without telling her where he goes, she hears footsteps in the empty flat upstairs when he’s gone, notices the (gas) light going down shortly after he leaves, and sees he openly flirts with the staff. He claims it’s all in her head, and that nothing of it is real, she’s just imagining all of it.
In reality, all of her observations are correct and factual, and she has very good reasons to be questioning what is going on: at the end of the play, a police officer informs her that her husband had killed the rich women who had lived in the flat upstairs. He hadn’t been able to find her hidden jewels and needed time and access to the empty flat to search for them. He had wooed and married her only because she owns the flat beneath the one in which the jewels were hidden. Every evening he goes to the upstairs flat to search for the jewels, and his wife hears his footsteps and notices that the gas light in her flat goes a bit lower, because of her husband turning up the lights in the empty flat upstairs.
The play ends with the husband being arrested for murder.
[End of spoiler alert]

The term ‘gaslighting’ is used very often these days, because humanity is waking up to the fact that for centuries, we have been “gaslit”. We are being told that what we see is in fact only in our head, in our imagination, and that we are mad if we believe our own eyes.

The exact same thing is happening with Brigitte Macron. Since 2016, the French elite-owned media have told the French and the world that Emmanuel Macron is a genius, and that Brigitte Macron is a gorgeous, graceful, sexy and very beautiful woman. She is literally nicknamed “the most beautiful legs of Paris” (one can only pity Paris).
But is this really what we see? Is this the reality and not some narrative meant to put lipstick on a pig and make us marry it?

Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but if there is no objective reality anymore, then we also don’t need to have presidents and their wives to run the illusion in our heads.
So what are we actually seeing here?

This page is a photo and video gallery to show Brigitte Macron, so that each one can make up their own mind.
It is divided into several sections, to focus on the different aspects of her appearance and behaviour.

Let’s be clear from the onset: this page is not meant to shame anybody. If this was just an old lady or an old transgender person or an old transvestite, who would care? All of us would probably feel pity for her, and that would be the end of it.
But if this was just an old anybody, this website would not exist either.
None of us have asked to be bombarded with pictures and stories about Brigitte Macron. At age 70 (according to officialdom 62), she herself chose this strategy, to be plastered all over the French media 24/7 from 2016 onwards. She herself wanted all the spotlights focused on her, and in fact, forced us to look at her.
Remember that Emmanuel Macron was only just beginning his political career, and is the youngest French president ever (it is obvious that without the immense 24/7 media campaign, he would never have won: he was unknown to the public). It is a known anecdote that Brigitte didn’t want Emmanuel to grow into the presidential run naturally and run for 2022 , but forced him to run for 2017, “because of my face” (she actually said “ma gueule”, a slang word that is quite derogatory). She added that five years later, she would be too old, she wouldn’t sell anymore.
Not surprising that the photographers who are allowed on trips with the Macrons are the ones of their loyal servant press who pass all pictures through software to make sure Brigitte looks at least 25 years younger than she is.

The reason why this page is important, is exactly because these media outlets, working for her and with her and on her request, have sold us a fake story to indoctrinate us, to make us believe reality is totally different from what it actually is. We are being manipulated into not looking anymore at what we see, but imagining that we see what we are being told. It’s a very dangerous development, and it is needed to be conscious of it. Because we are being duped. And one has to immediately ask: to what gain?
Keep in mind that this whole campaign was unprecedented: there has never been a wife of a president to be the actual, and out in the open, decision-maker-nobody-voted-for. It is literally as if the French had also voted for Brigitte Macron as president, illegally.

It is therefore not only allowed, but actually our task to look at the stories we have been sold, and to check whether they correspond to reality or not.
Is Brigitte Macron really this gorgeous, stylish, wonderful, caring person that of course Emmanuel had to fall in love with, and actually win as a trophy? Do we really want to have this person take vital decisions for France?

It was absurdly easy to find pictures of Brigitte Macron in which she looks bad or silly or weird or ugly, while other people in these pictures generally look normal. Contrary to all the claims of being super elegant and gorgeous, the amount of unflattering pictures of this person is staggering.
Remember that during the first presidential campaign, the person in these pictures was literally compared to Claudia Schiffer, a German top-model of the 1990s. Is that a valid comparison according to you?
It is exactly this dichotomy, the clash between what we are being told and what we see, that made Natacha Rey question why we are so clearly being lied to, and start digging for what is being covered up here. It’s the wig, the strange, male way of walking and behaving that led her to believe that Brigitte Macron is actually born male, and started this whole research.
It is up for everybody to see what they see or not, and to make up their own mind.
These are real pictures, many taken from the gossip magazines themselves, and claimed to be an example of style, elegance and feminine beauty. No kidding.
Well, you be the judge. Is this top femininity to you? What do you actually see?

Is this really a woman? Or a transvestite?

The fact that this cannot possibly be her own hair, not at this age (let alone the age of Jean-Michel Trogneux), should be obvious. But what else is going on here?

Do you prefer grapefruits or sausages?

What’s all going on here? Airpump working overtime?
Whenever Brigitte walks in long dresses, something very awkward happens, very visible in videos that are live-streamed. Most of the videos get scrubbed off the internet, and obviously the press will not keep such pictures online. It’s less visible in pictures if the dresses are dark or fully white, as cameras catch less contrast in these colour extremes and tend to turn the whole area white or dark. Note that it is generally not visible when she stands straight. It is the movement of pulling one leg back that pulls the dress across her crotch and reveals the bulge. It sometimes happens with shorter skirts also, but as they generally are made of thicker fabric, this is less happening. The last section of this page includes a picture in which Brigitte walks in a long white dress but because she walks with her torso bent forwards, she hides the effect. (Brigitte Macron often walks in that ‘falling’ way, as we will see in the next section.)
Remember that Brigitte Macron was a theatre teacher and is supposed to be well aware of the importance of posture and body movements.

The way she walks

It is an understatement to say the way Brigitte Macron walks has been noticed. In general, women, and certainly women who are constantly surrounded by paparazzi and cameras, will be conscious of the attention on them, and behave in a way that will not attract unwanted attention or be deemed out-of-the-ordinary, unless they want to make a statement.
Brigitte Macron walks with enormous strides, and with her feet and knees turned outwards. For someone who does not want to be associated with masculinity, that is remarkable: these are par excellence male movements.
Notice also how she almost always is the perfect example of how walking is in a way “controlled falling”.

Taking a seat

The same goes for sitting with spread legs and knees apart. If by age 70 you have not understood that this is uniquely associated with male behaviour, you surely have been living under a rock. Which woman will sit down like this in public, and while being recorded on top of it?

With hands and feet

Another feature Brigitte is famous for is slapping. Even though she didn’t slap him in the airplane, it was another gesture (as if she pulled up his lips or something), with both hands, but it was aggressive and went around the world as “slapping”. We only saw her hands, which are worth looking at. Nobody wants to get slapped by those.
Brigitte Macron is also known for her super high heels, again drawing attention to her walking. It is well known that drag queens like to wear very high heals, as it immediately gives a posture that is exclusively feminine (men never wear them or walk around on their toes), but more importantly: wearing stilettoes shortens the feet’s appearance. It is much more difficult to see the size of a foot when one is standing on their toes and not with feet flat on the ground.
Even so, everyone can see that Brigitte clearly has seriously large feet, and shoes that are in fact a bit too small, as her feet are curved even more than the shoe requires, and she does not seem to fully fit in the shoes: we very often see a gap between the middle of her foot and the shoe. It’s very reminiscent of the scene in Disney’s Cinderella where one of the step-sisters has crammed her foot into the glass slipper, by doing exactly that: curbing her foot completely to make sure the toes and the heel are in it, but everything else isn’t.
Notice also how by miracle the Macrons always have the same height difference, with shoes or without. That means that Emmanuel Macron wears the same high heels as Brigitte: to pretend they are normal, his shoes are much longer than needed, and they have a high backside, like boots, hidden by his always very long pants, but noticeable due to the pants folding where the shoe actually ends. All this to hide the fact that his wife’s feet are in fact as big as his, or even bigger?