• Welcome
• Introduction
• The research
  and the persons behind it
• The main characters
• The Algeria connection
• Jean-Michel in the army
• The 1977 interview with “Véronique”
• Brigitte the teacher
• The pictures
• The facial recognition
• Brigitte Macron as a woman
• The pedophiles around the Macrons
• Other noteworthy facts
• The court cases
• Update tracker

Candace Owens’s claim that the Macrons have ordered and paid for a death squad to assassinate her has lifted this affair from what may have seemed a silly rumour to a serious, high-level case of top political interest.

On the face of it, the issue of Brigitte Macron being born as Jean-Michel Trogneux may seem idiotic or trivial or even totally absurd and false.
But when looking at the facts, one can argue it is one of the bigger issues of our time.

Because

• the election of Emmanuel Macron was a scam: the media arranged it by massively promoting the couple of the Macrons as these extremely gifted, cultured, intelligent, talented, gorgeous, wonderful, socially engaged people, while at the same time slandering all the other candidates as corrupt sociopaths. This fact in itself already warrants an investigation into the Macrons.
  All elections are manipulated by the media, otherwise they would not be about campaign funding and airtime. This case is very clear though, as nobody had heard about Emmanuel Macron before. In this election, the fraud was clearly ‘on display’.
• the information provided during this political media campaign by the MSM about the Macrons’ past is factually untrue and makes no sense. It is highly disturbing that so much cover-up and lying had to take place for a presidential election – the question why and what is going on here forces itself upon every honest and good-willing citizen.
• Brigitte Macron was sold to the public as if she were running for President herself. She is legally not supposed to have any political power or position.
• France does not know the title of “Première Dame”. Wives of presidents have no legal function and hardly anybody outside of France has ever heard about the wives of former presidents Hollande, Sarkozy, Chirac or Mitterand.
  It was Brigitte Macron herself who invented this translation of the US “First Lady” title, to give herself a crown, while nobody in France had any say in it .
  The MSM, property of the friends of the Macrons, had to brainwash the French into believing this is all normal and good.
  They even proudly reported that Brigitte Macron takes many decisions for Emmanuel, who is legally the president. However, nobody ever voted for her or for this change in presidential policy.
  There is huge political and legal weirdness going on here, that is all covered up by loud claims of her being “gorgeous”, “intelligent” and “progressive”.
• if Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux, then she has taken on her sister’s identity. This is a legal offence of identity theft and imposture. Even if Brigitte Trogneux would have consented to her brother usurping her identity, it still remains a crime, as consent has no place in this matter: it is a crime towards society, not just towards a person, and if the person whose identity was stolen consented, they are complicit.
• if Brigitte Macron is not Brigitte Trogneux, then she has been signing tons of official documents by faking her sister’s signature: another very serious crime: signature forgery – and as a public figure!
• if Jean-Michel Trogneux has indeed taken on the identity of his sister Brigitte, then he has concluded a marriage under a false name, which is another crime.
  Note also that in 2007, gay marriage was not yet legal in France: another criminal act on top of the others.
  If this is so, then the marriage stands void, and in that case, what is her position in the Elysée even?
  And how would it be possible for Emmanuel Macron not to know that the person he married was living under a false identity? What position can a President have who was either conned by his ‘wife’, or complicit in the serious crime of identity theft?
• obviously, if such a series of offences came to light, that in itself would already make headlines worldwide: a man lives as his sister for decades and gets married as the sister. However, having this be the ‘first lady’ of France, the wife of the president, is totally unheard of.
• Brigitte Trogneux (then allegedly married to André Auzière) was 39 years old when the future Brigitte Macron started a romantic relationship with Emmanuel Macron, who was then 14. Since Brigitte Macron is said to have been this same Brigitte Trogneux-Auzière, this is again once more a criminal offence (“détournement de mineur”, which legally translates to ‘statutory rape’), aggravated by the fact that she was his teacher, and hence in a direct position of power over the minor.
• at first, the age gap was lied about, and the mainstream press had to acknowledge that the claim of ‘he was 17, she was 36’ was a lie. It is self-evident that this was an intentional lie and not some mistake, because there is nothing easier than calculating people’s ages when you know their birth years and the date of the event. Journalists do this all the time, and changing the age here to remove the legal implications is a first huge red flag that the official story cannot be trusted and that there is deliberate manipulation of the public here.
  The new ‘official’ age gap is now 15/39, while we know that Emmanuel was only 14 when Brigitte Macron ‘noticed him’ and he joined her theatre class.
• the age gap is even worse if Brigitte Macron is indeed Jean-Michel Trogneux, who is 8 years older than Brigitte Trogneux. The romantic relationship would then have been between a 14-year-old and a 47-year-old. Note that Jean-Michel Trogneux is born in February, while Emmanuel Macron is born in December. It makes the age gap almost 33 years wide.
• it is incomprehensible that nobody in the school where this affair was taking place took action. We are talking about 1993 here, not the 1950s. This is not a time in which protection of minors was not in the awareness of people. Brigitte Macron should have been suspended at the very least, but instead, every single person involved turned a blind eye and pretended there was nothing to see here. Why and how?
• according to French law, the statute of limitations for the crime of ‘détournement de mineur’  is presently 30 years after the minor turned 18. However, the statute of limitations at the time of the crime (1993), was lower (20 years), and it has expired by now. But the fact that no officials took action when it was clear that Brigitte and Emmanuel were having an affair in school is mind-blowing. We have witness testimony that neighbours were disgusted and denounced what was going on, but no official reaction to the known fact is registered.
  Here also, consent plays no role. It seems there was a huge conspiracy in the school and municipal authorities (remember that the mayor of Amiens was a close friend of the Trogneux family) to ensure no legal action was undertaken against Brigitte Macron (back then going by the name of Brigitte Auzière). This in strong contrast to the few other known cases, where severe punishment was meted out both against the teacher and the student.
  Again, anybody who cares about the rule of law should be denouncing the fact that the Macrons are apparently above the law.
• if Brigitte Macron is effectively born as Jean-Michel Trogneux, then all of the above is true.
  In that case there is so much that many highly-placed people cannot but be aware of, and we have an immense cover-up going on here.
  No citizen of any state should be willing to accept to live in a nation that schemes and conspires against its citizens on such a scale.
• if this is the case, then there will also be international players who know about it, and who can blackmail the Macron regime with this knowledge, putting France in a position of being possibly forced to take political decisions, not for geopolitical reasons, but only because the president has skeletons in the closet. That’s of course not an exceptional situation, but such things are never publicly acknowledged until everybody is long gone or dead. This affair might change that: the shape of the skeleton we’re discovering is completely out of bounds.
• the testimony of Candace Owens that Donald Trump had personally asked her at the end of February 2025 to shut up about this issue, at the request of Emmanuel Macron himself, as a quid-pro-quo for moving forward with the Ukraine negotiations, should have the whole world up in arms. It is proof that Macron himself is using this matter for political leverage, but more importantly, that the matter is very important but not debunkable by the Elysée.
  If the issue is so crucial to Macron that he uses his political power internationally to pressure Trump into silencing Candace Owens, it seems obvious the Macrons have no other means to stop people discussing their past: if they had, they would have used them long ago.
  Again: there is no ‘rumour’ more easily debunked than this absurd situation of someone living as their sister. It is also not at all degrading to do so, on the contrary: it would be a great victory in the public sphere.

This is not about Brigitte Macron being ‘transgender’.
This is about what on earth is going on at the highest levels of power in France.

Keep in mind that this ‘rumour’ started to circulate in 2021. 5 years ago. That’s not a brief moment of glory of a stupid social-media-hype that came and went because it was based on nothing and nobody cared two weeks later.

So here we are, after 5 years of the voices denouncing this reality growing louder and louder, with the affair having gotten a lot of international publicity – even though the European media are all of course pretending it’s a stupid and completely debunked nothingburger –, and with Macron himself having admitted that this ‘rumour’ was the worst memory of his first term. Which says a lot about this ‘president’, whose terms were nothing but political disaster, filled with absurdity, ridicule and violent popular opposition.

It would be the most simple, easy, self-evident, grandiose, victorious and smacking defeat of all ‘conspiracy theorists’ for Brigitte Macron to have a huge press conference together with her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, in which they present pictures and evidence of their earlier lives.
Everything would be solved in one single instant of total glory and vindication.
Yet Brigitte Macron does nothing of the sort.

The only thing we have is more censorship, legal attacks, arrests and intimidations, and state media who desperately shout there’s nothing to see here, without giving the tiniest bit of counter argument.
The whole reaction is only, purely, name-calling and harassment.

This is the key to this whole affair: the absence of actions, proofs and debunks is thunderingly loud, and is in fact the clearest indication and testimony that the theory is right on the mark.

While looking into the matter, one will find that, indeed, the most direct proof we have, and the most disturbing, is the total refusal to provide the relevant documents.
If Brigitte Macron is truly Brigitte Trogneux, and not Jean-Michel Trogneux, then why

• have they not once appeared in public together?
• are ALL of the school pictures of Brigitte Trogneux illegally refused to be made public?
• are many of the school pictures of Jean-Michel Trogneux illegally refused to be made public?
• was Jean-Michel Trogneux deleted from the Trogneux family’s online genealogy information, only to suddenly appear AFTER his existence had been proven by the Brigittologists?
• did the Amiens municipality TWICE inform Natacha Rey that Jean-Michel Trogneux was not born in Amiens, and that they therefore could not provide her with his birth certificate?
• does nobody provide a single picture of Brigitte Macron as pregnant or with any of her alleged three babies?
• does nobody provide a single picture of Brigitte Macron with her children and first husband? A normal family picture? ANYTHING showing Brigitte Macron’s alleged family life?

If this ‘rumour’ is a fake, stupid, idiotic conspiracy theory, then why are we still talking about it, today? And more than ever?