
BRIGITTEGATE
BRIGITTE THE TEACHER
The “most captivating middle-aged supermodel all girls wanted to be and all boys wanted to have”

[This page is not fully finished yet, the missing information will be added at the earliest.]
The original official story had it that Brigitte Macron was Emmanuel Macron’s French literature teacher. She was so horribly gorgeous she made all her students horny, and thus it was in fact a great conquest for Emmanuel to have won her over. He himself was supposedly a prodigy, an extremely intelligent and precocious kid, ripe beyond his age. He would of course later be crowned “the Mozart of finance”, in spite of the fact that former colleagues have testified he knew literally nothing of banking when he was promoted to the role of manager at the Rothschild’s bank, and that everybody knew he was a shoe-in, a nincompoop given a prestigious job at the bank because of cronyism.
Laurence, Brigitte’s daughter who was Emmanuel’s classmate, is supposed to have come home one day saying there was “this geek who knows everything about everything” (“un fou qui sait tout sur tout”) in her class, and of course she meant the wonderful Emmanuel Macron.
It is obvious that these are blatant lies, spread during the Macrons’ first presidential campaign, in order to glorify them and to divert the attention away from the pedophilic and criminal relationship Brigitte had with a student in her school.
But the lies were not spun coherently and thoroughly, and, as always, this aspect of Brigitte’s past is riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions.
The official website of the Elysée as well as the lawsuit the Macrons filed against Candace Owens mentions that Brigitte “started teaching in Paris and Strasbourg before joining La Providence [the school in Amiens where she met Emmanuel Macron, and where Jean-Michel Trogneux went to school as a kid from 1955 to 1959] in the early 1990s”.
However, nobody knows anything about Brigitte teaching in Paris before Strasbourg or Amiens! In fact, the biographies claim that she ended her career in Paris, in the very prestigious lyceum Saint-Louis de Gonzague, commonly known as “Franklin” because that is the name of the street it is located at (the French have this weird habit of nicknaming big institutions like ministries and colleges and such after their respective locations, which makes it hard for non-French people to understand what is being referred to exactly).
The official story is presently that Brigitte Trogneux went to college after finishing high school, but that she abandoned her studies to marry André Auzière and start a family.
Then, suddenly, when her husband’s promotion forced the family to move to Truchtersheim near Strasbourg, she had become a teacher out of the blue, and started a career at the Lucie Berger college in Strasbourg. In ‘the early 1990s’ indeed (as we get no clear dates), she moved back to Amiens and gets an appointment at the lyceum of La Providence. She teaches there for about a decade (again: no dates provided), and then is supposed to have been a highly connected and notable teacher at “Franklin”.
As unbelievable as it may seem, we have not a single document that proves any of this. There are many pictures, and it is certain that Brigitte Macron was at La Providence, but we don’t have
- any document proving Brigitte Trogneux/Auzière/Macron obtained any degree, other than a mention in a bulletin linked to the Lucie Berger college that she would have obtained what is called “CAPÈS” (the license to teach in public high schools) at the end of her years at that institution
- any document proving Brigitte Trogneux/Auzière/Macron was appointed as a teacher at any of the three mentioned institutions
- any clear dates of appointment and termination at any of the three mentioned institutions
- any document proving the official claim that she got a master’s degree in literature from some unnamed university, with a dissertation on “courtly love”
We are immediately in quicksand here: how, where and when did Brigitte “Auzière” obtain her permission to be working as a teacher? Why is this impossible to figure out? Was she even legally allowed to teach? The Lucie Berger college is a private school, so the rules are less strict there, but still, there is no consensus about which year exactly she started, as what, and why. What school in Paris would she have worked at before going to Strasbourg, as the Elysée website claims? Which university did she study at? What exactly did she study? The official claim from Brigitte is that she has a masters in Modern Literature, but early biographies claimed authoritatively that she had a degree in Classical Literature. Which one is it? Why can nobody prove any of it? What is going on here? Who actually is the person in the pictures?
LYCÉE-COLLÈGE LUCIE BERGER (Strasbourg)
Brigitte and André Auzière are supposed to have lived in Truchtersheim for a certain number of years, which is a very small village of a few thousand souls, 15 kilometres from Strasbourg, tucked away near the border with Germany, in the Alsace region. Quite a remote place for people who were part of the high society of Amiens and Paris.
And there are no pictures of Brigitte Macron as a mother or of the family in Truchtersheim. In fact, there is no proof of anything at all apart from the school pictures of Brigitte as a teacher.
We can establish from the available school pictures that Brigitte worked at Lucie Berger from the school year 1986-87 until 1990-91.
For context, we need to remember that Brigitte Auzière, if she really is Brigitte Trogneux, was 33 in 1986. That’s a lot younger than she was when she worked at La Providence, and from the pictures we have, she was looking a lot better back then – assuming this is the same person, which it may not be. Yet we don’t hear any claims from Lucie Berger of her being an irresistible piping-hot trendsetter who had all the boys’ hearts racing and wet dreaming about. No, that nonsense is reserved for the lucky students of La Providence, when Brigitte is 38. This is not to say that women of that age cannot be really good-looking and sexually very attractive, but we do have eyes and can judge for ourselves, can’t we?
Add to that the fact that Jean-Michel Trogneux was 41 in 1986, and 46 when Brigitte supposedly discovered the eagle-eyed Emmanuel.
None of the pictures available for the Lucie Berger college have been released officially.
France has since 2001 a website called Copains d’avant (“Friends from long ago”), where people who subscribe can post and view school pictures from all over France at any time in history.
Several of the pictures from Lucie Berger that we have are from that website, others come from the Bulletin of the Association des Anciens de Lucie Berger (AALB – Associtation of Alumni of Lucie Berger), but most of them are – how could they not – weird. We don’t get enough explanation, don’t get to know what “Brigitte Auzière” was teaching or even in what capacity she was working: was she an intern?
There is also no clarity at all how long the Auzières would have lived in Truchtersheim, a small village about 15 kilometres outside Strasbourg. Once again, everything here is weird and contradictory. When Brigitte Macron visited the place in 2018, it was claimed she lived there no less than 7 years. But the move is said to have been in 1985 or 1986, and in 1991 or 1992 she was already back in Amiens. If the 7 years are correct, the period must have been 1984 till 1991. In Viriginie Linhart‘s propadocu it is claimed it was 4 years. That’s what we find picture evidence for, but it’s absurd that we don’t have any factual evidence for when and how and what exactly. It’s like a story where details and precision don’t matter: “Once upon a time…”, “One day…”, “On a beautiful morning…”, “A few years later…”, “When some time had passed…”: nobody cares about the exact timings, because it’s just a story, not real life. Brigitte Macron’s official biography feels as unreal and fictitious.
As mentioned in the entry for André Auzière, the absurdity of the official story is staggering: the young family had to move there because André was relocated and promoted their by the bank he was working for (nobody can figure out which bank that was!), but at the same time he was never home because he was always out… for his work!
So what were the Auzières actually doing there? Did they really go and live there? Who is the woman in these pictures?
It is at this stage in the investigation of Brigitte Trogneux/Auzière/Macron’s lives not possible to exactly date pictures. Almost no official pictures come with dates. Many pictures also have no original source.
1986-87




The school staff picture is shown in the Brigitte Macron: un roman français propadocu, as always without any caption or date or explanation. We can date it because of the clothes Brigitte wears.
What is important is that we check the femininity, the resemblance with Brigitte Macron, and the state of the teeth, especially the two frontal upper incisors.
The teeth are important as it seems that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte have a gap between the frontal upper incisors, which may make identification possible.
This gap was also later corrected.
From the close-up we can see that the front teeth are not fully straight or correctly aligned, but they don’t seem to show a real gap.
The class picture is from the Copains d’avant website, posted there by a certain “Sarah K”, and published on X by an account called Fiko. It comes with the caption that this is “Class 2-3 of 1986-87”. France counts school classes backwards, so 2nd grade would be the equivalent of 10th grade in the US, with students aged 15-16.
It was posted together with another class picture, that of the next year.
Both pictures come in a very low quality and small size, they both seem clearly digital pictures of printed pictures in a photo album.
Zooming in to get a close up of the face is not useful, the pixelation is too strong to see any detail anymore.
We can recognize that Brigitte wears the same blouse or sweater and vest as in the staff group picture, and because the hairstyle is also identical, we know it was taken on the same day.
1987-88






We have three pictures for this year.
First up: another school staff picture from the Brigitte Macron: un roman français propadocu. We can again date it because of the clothes and jewelry Brigitte wears, and because of her haircut.
In the close-up, we can again see that there is some kind of issue with the frontal upper incisors, but it doesn’t really look like a gap. Was there some half-way solution to fill the gap with something that made it look less obvious?
The first picture with a class is also from the Copains d’avant website, posted also by “Sarah K”, and published on X by Fiko. This one comes with the caption “Class 1A of 1987-88”. This is then a 1st grade class, equivalent to 11th grade in the US, with students aged 16-17.
Sarah K. has posted these pictures in 2017, which was the same year of the presidential elections that brought the Macrons to power. Sarah identified 8 people in this picture, and 5 in the former one.
Weirdness can’t be absent in anything related to Brigittegate, and thus is the age given for the people she tagged like this, according to Fiko:
“Estelle P. 38 years old, Hélène H. 33, Hélène M. 51, Marc B. 67, Muriel M. 51, Olivier M. 53, Raphael S. 55 and lastly Valérie M. without age mentioned but let’s say she’s about 51-52.”
This is obviously insane. Either all the tagging Sarah K. has done is false, and then we have to doubt her dating also, or she has no clue how old these people actually are and has somehow given absurd ages. The question is: what did she try to do?
All of these students should have been 46-48 years old, if these are 16-17 year olds somewhere in late spring 1988 (assuming pictures are taken at the end of the school year). Nobody in the picture is 3 years old, and none of the students is 37 year old. Even Brigitte is supposed to be only 35.
There’s another class picture available on Pressibus. It’s high quality, but not dated. But with Brigitte wearing the exact same clothes and very prominent green shoes, and having the same hairstyle, we can confidently say it’s a picture of the same day.
The person on the left has been marked with a red rectangle, but Pressibus does not mention by whom. This was done to indicate that the picture seems to contain two teachers, because that left side person clearly seems to be way older than 17. Why would Brigitte not be the only teacher in a class picture? It may be unimportant, but the person who published this picture seems to have thought otherwise.
In the close-up of that picture, we can now clearly see there actually IS a small gap between the to frontal upper teeth, tying up with the school pictures of Jean-Michel Trogneux as a child…
1988-89




There are no known school pictures of this schoolyear.
Strangely enough, this is the year in which Brigitte Auzière seems to have been a candidate to become the mayor of Truchtersheim, as there is a leaflet published (in horrendously low quality, which is suspicious in itself) that was part of the campaign of a local political party that competed in the municipal elections in France on 12 and 19 March 1989.
If the party had won the elections, Brigitte would have been offered the position of mayor as she was the party’s top candidate.
Clearly nothing came of it, but if this is the same person, then she had a stunning revenge through her new husband winning the presidency almost 30 years later.
There is no known interview in which Brigitte macron is asked or speaks about this attempt at a political career.
The information was published by the French national TV channel France 3 in 2017.
There are several versions of the picture online, some very bad, some better, adjusted to try to get a better portrait, and one ‘enhanced’ and coloured by AI, which turns the picture clearly into a different person altogether.
(The second picture with the red ellipse is the clearest.)
Remarkably, we recognise the picture as being a variant of the class picture of 1986-87: it seems to be a cut-out from a second picture of this exact same class, as the background behind her seems to be the blue sweater with the white collar and the hand of the boy standing behind her, and her clothes are not only the same, but in the exact same position that we see in the class picture of 1986-87. The only difference is that she looks into the camera instead of to the left.
This means that she used a picture of two years earlier instead of a new one for this political leaflet. Or that the dating of the class picture is wrong.
1989-90


There is only one picture of the year 1989-90, and it is the school staff picture.
1990-91
La Providence
The fact that Brigitte would have obtained her CAPÈS teaching license just before moving to La Providence in Amiens makes sense in that she would not have been able to do that otherwise.
However, it is once again claimed that this move back to Amiens was also for André Auzière’s work. He suddenly was moved back there, while nobody can find any proof of any transfer or promotion or whatever in the almost ghostlike life of this man.
While these moves seem way more important and related to what happened in the life of Brigitte Macron.
Pension

